top of page

RESULTS

In the end, both of the datasets collected showed a small positive correlation between hillslope and landslide area.

In Figure 1, the Gregory Creek slides have a steeper coupling relationship relative to those in Riley Creek. It also seems that the Gregory Creek plot has a stronger R² value (coefficient of determination), suggesting the Gregory Creek trendline more accurately replicates the observed data than the Riley Creek model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For both the Riley and Gregory Creek datasets, Figure 2 illustrates much shallower sloping regression trendlines. Although positive, this suggests that the inclusion of data points further down the hillslope causes the slope-area relationship to decrease and reach an inflection point. This is consistent with the findings of Montgomery et al [1993] seen in Figure 3, which characterized an inflection of the slope-area graph as being a transitional zone changing from debris-flow dominated channels to lower-gradient colluvial channels. Because I chose to use landslide area in this study instead of drainage basin area, my results only pertain to the hillslope regions of the watershed. Figure 3 shows this channel head region as having a positive relationship prior to reaching the inflection point. Both of the datasets I collected are predominantly points of channel head, and therefore I believe the reduction in slope between Figure 1 and Figure 2 is supported in this model, as the Figure 2 data includes points further down the hillslope yet still considered as channel head.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Figure 3 it is noted that hillslope terrain tends to be convex in nature, while surface elevation further down the drainage basin often flattens out or becomes concave. I attempted to simulate this as well, using the Curvature Tool to create a Second Derivative Surface Raster. This value is the longitudinal change in surface slope; the rate of change in slope. After overlaying the landslide features above this Curvature Model, I discovered that many of the landslide areas directly correlate to the concavity of the terrain. This is illustrated in Figure 4 and Figure 5 as the convex curvature of the surface indicated by the dark raster cells highly correlated with the outlines of the overlying landslide areas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

 

 

 

​

In the future, I plan to pursue similar types of geomorphology-based GIS research. If I were to re-attempt this project I would suggest using drainage basin area in my analysis;  not just landslide area. I would additionally look into finding an improved method of data capture throughout the entire channel basin as well as taking linear cumulative measurements along the dominant stream in each basin.

 

Activation-Point-Slope-vs-Landslide-Area

 Figure 1. (Dataset 1)

SubLandslide-Centroid-Slope-vs-Downslope

 Figure 2. (Dataset 2)

Montgomer_et_al_1993_Slope_Area_Graph.pn

 Figure 3. (Montgomery et al 1993)

Curvature_Landslide_Overlap_Zoomed_In-30

 Figure 4.

 Figure 5.

CONCLUSION

Updated_HG_Curvature_With_Slide_Map.png
GEOGlogo.png

University of British Columbia

Department of Geography

© 2018 by Joshua Green. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page